Titanium parts
Moderators: StephenRC45, Dave45, Andy
Titanium parts
Whilst your wish is not my command, you may consider it forgotten Dave.
Titanium parts
To all, particularly markrc45.
I have looked over a few of the topics and threads to which I’ve ‘contributed’(?), e.g., Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:43 pm, subject: who and why.
I see I have used the phrase “a couple of my bikes’”, so I had (in fact) already, and - most importantly - publicly (and by my own choice of phraseology) claimed to have several RC45’s… which in truth I do have, but that is unimportant. What is important, however, is that I have wrongfully (but without malice) accused markrc45 of breaking a confidence between us. Therefore:
1. I apologise to markrc45 entirely and unreservedly for any distress I may have caused him.
2. I withdraw any and all comments and/or suggestions I have made in posts on this subject that may have caused markrc45 any distress - and I renew my apology to him.
3. My apology to markrc45 (given entirely and unreservedly) is given as I see and acknowledge that I’m the one in the wrong. My apology is also given with pleasure as it pleases me to know that I have an opportunity at attempting to set a wrong right – hopefully with the injured party, markrc45, accepting my apology.
As for all other contributors and/or observers, clearly any distress I may have caused to you I also apologise for.
While I’m rendered an improved person as a result of the matter in question (and for that I give my thanks - to all), I also recognise and appreciate that I remain far from perfect and therefore entirely prone to making mistakes – for which I will always gracefully apologise when such mistakes are pointed out, or indeed whenever I might discover them for myself.
Regards to all.
Roger.
I have looked over a few of the topics and threads to which I’ve ‘contributed’(?), e.g., Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:43 pm, subject: who and why.
I see I have used the phrase “a couple of my bikes’”, so I had (in fact) already, and - most importantly - publicly (and by my own choice of phraseology) claimed to have several RC45’s… which in truth I do have, but that is unimportant. What is important, however, is that I have wrongfully (but without malice) accused markrc45 of breaking a confidence between us. Therefore:
1. I apologise to markrc45 entirely and unreservedly for any distress I may have caused him.
2. I withdraw any and all comments and/or suggestions I have made in posts on this subject that may have caused markrc45 any distress - and I renew my apology to him.
3. My apology to markrc45 (given entirely and unreservedly) is given as I see and acknowledge that I’m the one in the wrong. My apology is also given with pleasure as it pleases me to know that I have an opportunity at attempting to set a wrong right – hopefully with the injured party, markrc45, accepting my apology.
As for all other contributors and/or observers, clearly any distress I may have caused to you I also apologise for.
While I’m rendered an improved person as a result of the matter in question (and for that I give my thanks - to all), I also recognise and appreciate that I remain far from perfect and therefore entirely prone to making mistakes – for which I will always gracefully apologise when such mistakes are pointed out, or indeed whenever I might discover them for myself.
Regards to all.
Roger.
Titanium parts
Thank you, Mark, for your fair and kind acceptance of my apology. Given my error, for me to say that I now feel like a Totally Wantonly And Terrible fellow is certainly an understatement.
Regards,
Roger.
Regards,
Roger.